|
Focus on Sex Selection
|
|
UNFPA EECA Warns of Dangers of Prenatal Sex Selection
A new report by UNFPA's
office for Eastern Europe and Central Asia reveals that an estimated
171,000 girls are 'missing' in South Caucasus and parts of South-East
Europe while there is a growing surplus of men. Preventing gender-biased sex selection in Eastern Europe and Central Asia
contains a dire message of concern on the anticipated impact of the
destruction of unborn baby girls and distorted sex ratios:
"Sex
imbalances at birth will also translate two decades on into a surplus
of men, a demographic imbalance likely to affect their marriage
prospects and one with the potential to increase human trafficking,
crime, gender-based violence, and political unrest in severely affected
regions."
The report demonstrates
that countries experiencing the harmful consequences of this
disastrous population control tool--devised by population control
activists not only to reduce births by destroying unborn baby girls but
to eliminate future mothers-- need to take action to stop the
practice which often stems from a cultural preference for boys.
The 2011 resolution
passed by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe on
Prenatal Sex Selection is credited in part as a reason for growing
actions for awareness and efforts to stop it.
The resolution brought
attention to the fact that prenatal sex selection has resulted in
unbalanced sex ratios in Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia
where the sex ratios at birth varied from 111-112 boys for 100 girls.
It condemned the practice "as a phenomenon which finds its roots in
a culture of gender inequality and reinforces a climate of violence
against women, contrary to the values upheld by the Council of Europe."
As in the UNFPA report, the Resolution warned Member States of the social consequences of prenatal sex selection, "namely
population imbalances which are likely to create difficulties for men
to find spouses, lead to serious human rights violations such as forced
prostitution, trafficking for the purposes of marriage or sexual
exploitation, and contribute to a rise in criminality and social unrest."
Included in a list of suggested actions was a call for Member States to "introduce
legislation with a view to prohibiting sex selection in the context of
assisted reproduction technologies and legal abortion, except when it
is justified to avoid a serious hereditary disease".
The UNFPA report
describes how abortion, especially the use of abortion pills, is used
to fuel this extreme act of gender discrimination:
"Abortion,
which has long served as a standard family planning method, is now
also used as a way to avoid female births. More recently, the emergence
and misuse in the region of medical abortion pills and of assisted
reproduction technologies may offer new ways for couples to practice sex
selection, further fuelling discriminatory behaviour."
This new report
describes legal bans on sex selection abortions, on technology for sex
determination, and on advertisements for such technology as "obvious policy options for targeting prenatal discriminatory behavior" and states that such bans "send
a clear signal of governments' official position towards sex selection
and provide a basis for inter-ministry cooperation around issues of
gender discrimination."
However, pro-abortion politics is injected into the report as it also states that bans on sex selection abortion can have a "risk of infringing on reproductive rights."
The UNFPA report accurately notes how the outcome document of the ICPD
meeting in Cairo called for the elimination of prenatal sex selection
and female infanticide:
"The
ICPD Programme of Action adopted by 179 countries in 1994 aims in
particular at '[eliminating] all forms of discrimination against the
girl child and the root causes of son preference, which results in
harmful and unethical practices regarding female infanticide and
prenatal sex selection'."
It is regrettable that
at the recent UN meeting of the Commission on Population and
Development the controversial outcome document made no mention of the
need to stop the violence and discrimination of sex selection abortion
and completely ignored the war on unborn baby girls.
|
|
|
Global Pro-Life
|
|
US: States Banning Dismemberment Abortions and Advancing Pro-Life Legislation
The states of Kansas
and Oklahoma became the first to ban second trimester D and E
dismemberment abortions during which the abortionist severs the unborn
child's body parts and forcefully removes them from the womb. The
pro-life laws is based on legislation developed by National Right to Life.
According to the
organization, this gruesome procedure was described by U.S. Supreme
Court Justice Kennedy in dissent to the 2000 Stenberg v. Carhart
decision as follows:
"The
fetus, in many cases, dies just as a human adult or child would: It
bleeds to death as it is torn limb from limb. The fetus can be alive at
the beginning of the dismemberment process and can survive for a time
while its limbs are being torn off."
Justice
Kennedy added in the Court's 2007 opinion in Gonzales v. Carhart that
D&E abortions are "laden with the power to devalue human life..."
The new law in Kansas prohibits abortionists
from using forceps, clamps, scissors or other similar instruments to
remove the unborn baby. Abortion advocates criticize pro-lifers for
"renaming" the procedure, but in actuality, their own abortion doctors
confirm that the term personifies what the D&E procedure entails.
The bill, drafted by the National Right to Life Committee, has also
been filed in South Carolina, Oklahoma and Missouri.
Priests for Life has additional resources
available on this procedure, including comments from abortionists. The
bill has also been filed in South Carolina, Oklahoma and Missouri.
Additionally, since January, over 300 pro-life bills
have been filed in 43 states, mainly bills to ban abortion after 20
weeks gestation or to restrict abortions induced by medication,
according to pro-abortion Guttmacher Institute. Others measures involve
waiting periods, personhood amendments, informed consent, and a ban
on abortions after detection of a heartbeat. Over a dozen states have
passed pro-life bills in one chamber and several have passed both
chambers, including Idaho, Arkansas, West Virginia and Arizona.
|
|
Nigeria: Pro-Life Conference Condemns Push for Abortion on African Society
Responding to the growing threats from the Culture of Death, Catholic Bishops, priests, religious and laity of the Ibadan Ecclesiastical Province in Nigeria recently gathered for an International Pro-Life and Pro-Family Conference in Ibadan entitled, Protecting Human Life and Family Values in the Rising Tide of the Culture of Death.
The conference brought together 1,500 participants who heard
from pro-life and pro-family leaders, advocates and researchers. In an
open letter published by Catholic Online,
Obianuju Ekeocha, founder of the Culture of Life Africa and an
organizer of the conference, spoke of the palpable conviction among
participants:
"It was a real dream come true for me to see many of my
people becoming more aware of the threats to the sanctity of life, love
and marriage. We saw so many of them joining hands and hearts with us
in our efforts to keep the Culture of Death out of Africa!"
The conference issued an outcome statement- "Protecting God's gift of Life and Family"- which affirmed the sanctity of life from conception among its declarations:
i. Every human
being is created in the image and likeness of God. Life is God's gift
and this life begins at conception. Thus, every nation, every
Institution, every man and woman must respect, protect and uphold the
dignity of every human life from the moment of conception till its
natural end.
The statement condemned efforts that threaten life and the family, including:
-The encroachment of the Culture of Death in many African countries. -the
radical promotion of Abortion and contraception by various
international organisations through international platforms and
humanitarian aid. -the hyper-sexualisation of our youth through morally objectionable campaigns by these organizations. -the
intentional disregard for our cultural identity and values especially
on issues relating to the sanctity of life and the dignity of human
sexuality. -the persistent and pernicious attempts to impose
population control on Africa by wealthy philanthropists, donor nations
and international organizations. -the lack of emphasis on the importance of faith and family in human development, public education and in the social order.
Signed by the
Most Reverend Emmanuel Badejo the Bishop of Oyo and Obianuju Ekeocha,
the statement invites "every member of our human society to the noble
service of constantly and courageously defending the sanctity of human
life, marriage and family." A short video highlighting the conference
is available here.
|
|
Global Celebrations Mark the Day of the Unborn Child
Pro-lifers across
the globe marked the Day of the Unborn Child, March 25th, through
marches, forums, Masses and various events celebrating the sanctity of
life. In what is being called the largest pro-life event
in Latin American history, over half a million people marched for life
in the streets of Lima, Peru. The march, organized by the Latin
American office of the Population Research Institute, was heralded as a
joyful celebration of life. "All those young people singing and
dancing tell you that the future will be better for all of us and many
unborn babies will be saved from abortions," said a participant.
Thousands took to the streets in Prague in the Czech Republic's 15th annual National March for Life,
where marchers stood up for the 20,000 babies killed in abortion each
year and called for more support for pregnant women. 77 cities across
Romania held local marches and events during a week entitled "Every Life
is a Gift", concluding with the 5th annual March for Life in
Bucharest. A press release for event said this year's message: "...is
that each person is unique and has infinite value. Society has only to
gain by supporting persons with special needs and particularly by
helping women in pregnancy crisis to give birth and raise the persons
they are carrying in their wombs. These persons are gifts to their
mothers and also a gift made by the woman to her family and to
society."
Marches were held in Moldova for the first time, with the same theme.
A peaceful pro-life rally outside the EU buildings in Brussels, Belgium was physically forced
to disband by police. The rally, which was legally registered and
organized by Polish pro-life group Fundacja Pro, displayed photos of
abortion victims which appeared to trigger a frantic reaction from some
protestors who encircled them. Police officers blamed the pro-lifers
for the disruption and took their banners and flags.
Additionally, prayer vigils were held around the world in honor
of life. A thousand people participated in a special prayer vigil in
Rome held by the Pontifical Council for the Family and promoted by
Priests for Life. Similar vigils were held in the Basilica
of Our Lady of Guadalupe in Mexico City, at Fatima, at Lourdes, and at
Nazareth, and many others. Priests for Life encouraged churches who have not done so yet to hold a vigil for life.
|
|
|
Focus on the United Nations
|
|
Push for SRHR Derailed at UN CPD Meeting
The 48th Session of the
Commission on Population and Development (CPD), ended last Friday
without an outcome document, an historic first. Developing countries
sought an outcome that included key development issues and were
frustrated at the profusion of references to population control,
adolescent sexual activity, abortion, and comprehensive sexuality
education (CSE) for children. The UN press office released a statement
summarizing the meeting entitled: Commission on Population and
Development Unable to Agree upon Proposed Resolution, Reproductive
Rights among Points of Contention.
Following eight days of
closed door negotiations an official Chair's proposal was presented on
the last day of the meeting since Member States could not reach
agreement on a consensus document. The Chair implored delegations "to go
along with the text". They did not and shocked many in the room,
including UNFPA and the Commission.
The African Group,
represented by Nigeria, was the first to speak and requested an
additional ten minutes for discussion. Nigeria's Deputy Permanent
Representative to the United Nations, Ambassador Usman Sarki, speaking
eloquently and diplomatically, stated that the text could not be a
"final text" as it still contained "notions, positions and language"
that the African Group could not support and language that would impose
"impossible and unacceptable commitments" upon Member States. He
implored the Chair to "go the extra mile" and "allow further
negotiations to remove objectionable elements." (UN Web TV coverage).
The request was refused
by the Chair of the Commission, Ms. Bénédicte Frankinet (Belgium), who
surprisingly withdrew the text and instead called for a summary of the
draft's negotiations.
The action by the
African Group, and the support it received from other countries,
demonstrates the growing SRHR and CSE fatigue of many developing UN
Member States. Ambassador Sarki stated that in the future UN officials
"should refrain from putting language in drafts on which there is no
consensus" adding that Member States "have resisted the imposition of
unhelpful ideas and concepts on all the membership."
Read more here.
|
|
|
Legislative News
|
|
EU: New Treaty Cracks Down on Organ Trafficking
The first international treaty on organ trafficking
was recently signed by fourteen European countries. Exact figures on
organ trafficking are not known but it is has proven to be a lucrative
practice and growing problem around the world. It is estimated to
generate US $1.2 billion each year. While organ trafficking is illegal
in most countries, there are loopholes in the laws which the convention
seeks to correct.
Specifically,
the convention criminalizes organ trading, since many donors are
willing participants, criminalizes cooperation in organ trafficking and
provides support for victims of trafficking. The convention was
initiated by the Council of Europe and so far has been signed by
Albania, Austria, Belgium, the Czech Republic, Greece, Italy,
Luxembourg, Norway, Moldova, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Turkey and the
United Kingdom. It will go into force after it has been ratified by five
countries.
|
|
France: New Law Increases Access to Abortion
The French National Assembly has passed legislation to widen access to abortion. The bill removes a seven day waiting
period, reduces the required medical consultations, permits doctors to
perform abortions in community health centers and authorizes midwives to
administer abortion drugs. The new bill also imposes quotas
establishing a minimum number of abortions each Regional Health
Authority must procure. France already has a high annual rate of
abortions--or as they're called "voluntary pregnancy
interruptions"-- with 200,000 a year, yet critics complain the wait
times are too long for abortions. Pro-abortion parliamentarian Catherine
Coutelle said the intent is to "normalize" abortion so it is not seen
as a moral issue. The bill now awaits consideration by the Senate, which
it is expected to pass and be enacted into law this summer.
|
|
|
Executive News
|
|
Colombia: Health Ministry Creates Guidelines for Euthanasia; Catholic Hospitals Threaten to Close
Colombia's Health Minister Alejandro Gaviría has established guidelines
for euthanasia to permit 'competent' adults with a terminal illness to
request death by lethal injection. The Health Ministry's action follows
an order by the Supreme Court to act on a 1997 ruling that declared
euthanasia a constitutional right. The Catholic Church, which operates
some of the most reliable and safest hospitals in the country, strongly
protested the move. The head of the Colombian Catholic bishops'
conference, Bishop Juan Vicente Cordoba Cordoba said "we will proceed to close all our hospitals if they insist on forcing us to kill."
Bishop Cordoba also called for dialogue and a vote in the legislature on the issue: "The
court does not make laws, nor is it in their jurisdiction to regulate a
department of the government. Only the Congress of the Republic makes
laws. They took an unconstitutional shortcut, and we cannot accept it
from a juridical point of view."
|
|
|
Judicial News
|
|
Mexico: Pro-Life Petition Urges Supreme Court to Respect Life
As the Mexican Supreme Judicial Court prepares to review a law that could open the door to abortion in the country, a petition
with over 120,000 signatures is asking the Court to reaffirm the right
to life. The Court will soon be considering an abortion liberalization
bill from the Mexican state of Tlaxcala and ruling on
its constitutionality. The petition drive, sponsored by CitizenGo, warns
of the national ramifications if the law is declared unconstitutional.
In addition to overturning Tlaxcala's law, the ruling would set a
precedent for the rest of the country that usher in abortion. "Respect
our legal tradition, our constitutional accords, the international
treaties that Mexico has signed and our principles and values as a
nation," CitizenGO stated, and emphasized that "the right to abortion does not exist."
|
|
|
Issues
|
|
Poll: Unborn Children Are People
A new poll
from YouGov found that 52% of Americans believe life begins at
conception and 66% believe unborn children are people. 76% responded
that someone who attacks a pregnant woman should be charged if it leads
to the "death of her unborn child". On the question of abortion, YouGov
said 56% think abortion should not be legal on request, with 17% saying
that it should never be allowed and 39% saying that it should only be
allowed in certain special cases. 16% support abortion until the first
trimester, while 9% support it until the point of survivability, and 20%
believe that abortion should always be legal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parliamentary Network for Critical Issues
Advancing global respect and dignity for life through law
and policy.
|
www.pncius.org |
Visit us on the web!
www.PNCIUS.org
has been updated with expanded information on Human Dignity and critical
issues including: Abortion, Bioethics, Child Mortality, End of life issues,
Infanticide, Maternal mortality and Sex-selective abortion.
|
Contact PNCI |
|
Parliamentary Network for Critical Issues
P.O. Box 20203
Washington, DC 20041
703-433-2767
info@pncius.org
All news articles include links to original source. PNCI cannot verify that the
information contained in the news articles is accurate.
|
|
|