|
Pro-Life Actions
|
|
President Trump's First 100 Days
President Trump took decisive pro-life
actions during his first 100 days in office affecting policies on abortion in
the US and around the world. In one of his first Executive Orders, President
Trump reissued
and expanded the Mexico City Policy (MCP) preventing foreign
non-governmental organizations from receiving funds from the U.S. Agency for
International Development (USAID) unless they pledge to not perform or promote
abortion as a method of family planning, regardless of the funding source. The
policy previously only applied to monies from the population account but was
extended to apply to "all global health
assistance furnished by all departments or agencies".
President Trump's selection to the
Supreme Court, Judge Neil Gorsuch, was confirmed and began his tenure on the
Court. Judge Gorsuch is expected to have a pro-life position similar to the
late Justice Anton Scalia. As a judge, Gorsuch ruled against the Obama
administration's HHS mandate and has written a book opposing the legalization
of euthanasia and assisted suicide.
Legislation passed by Congress, House
Joint Resolution 43, was signed by President Trump to allow states to
distribute family planning funds, known as Title X, to non-abortion providers
including community health centers, county health departments, or other types
of providers. Previously, Obama's Department of Health and Human Services had
blocked states from choosing not to fund abortion providers.
President Trump cut-off
US funds to the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) due to its support
for China's coercive population control program. The administration explained
that it was dropping the funding because UNFPA "supports, or participates
in the management of, a program of coercive abortion or involuntary
sterilization". Funds currently allocated to UNFPA will be transferred to
the "Global Health Account" where it will be used for family
planning, maternal health and non-abortive reproductive health activities. The
decision is based on application of existing U.S. law, the Kemp-Kasten
Amendment, which was enacted for the first time in 1985 and prohibits foreign
aid to any organization that the administration determines is involved in
coercive abortion or involuntary sterilization.
Pro-life groups in the US reacted with
words of thanks and appreciation. Father
Frank Pavone of Priests for Life said, "As President Trump's first
term marks the completion of its first 100 days, I want to express on my own
behalf and that of Priests for Life the gratitude we have to him and his
Administration for the significant progress that has been made and victories
that have been won for the cause of protecting children in the womb from
abortion."
|
|
USA: State Legislatures Advancing Pro-Life Laws
According to a recent analysis from the
pro-abortion Guttmacher
Institute, state legislatures have kicked off 2017 with a slew of pro-life
legislation. Already, 431 initiatives seeking to restrict access to abortion
have been introduced. Five states- Arizona, Arkansas, Kentucky, Utah and
Wyoming- have passed ten new laws that will ban abortions after 20 weeks,
require ultrasounds for women seeking abortion, create requirements for
abortion facilities, impose policies to save babies who survive abortion, and
more. 88 measures introduced in 28 states would ban abortions totally or in
certain circumstances. Guttmacher notes that additional legislative initiatives
are advancing, including measures to ban sex selection abortion.
|
|
Prague March for Life and Family Doubles In Size
Thousands of people came out for
Prague's 17th National
March for Life and Family this month, raising their voices against the
country's abortion laws and marching in support of life. The number of
participants doubled from previous years for this year's March, which had the
support of political, religious, and public figures and several NGOs. Cardinal
Dominik Duka, the archbishop of Prague, kicked off the March with mass. He
later posted on Facebook the importance of speaking up for life, "most
importantly, we marched for something, not just 'against' something, as is
usual for us. We want to be not only in opposition, but occupy a position and
can encourage for good, not just to criticize." (Translated)
|
|
|
International Pressure for Abortion
|
|
Push for Self-Induced Abortion and OTC Sale of RU 486
An international pro-abortion tactic
that advises women on how to self-induce abortion in illegal settings is
receiving attention and extensive news coverage in the US with the launch of a new 'counseling helpline' by
the organization Women Help Women
(WHW) targeting women in the US.
The project- Women
Help Women USA: Self-managed Abortion Safe and Supported-SASS- is described by organizers as "the
first service to provide one-on-one support from trained counselors to women in
the U.S. seeking to end their own pregnancies."
WHW explains that its action is due to
the pro-life positions of President Trump, Congress and states legislators,
"The new service comes at a time when Donald Trump has pledged to
overturn Roe v. Wade, Congress is held by a majority of anti-abortion
legislators, and many states are down to their last abortion provider."
The
advice offered includes a focus on misoprostol-only abortion which causes
uterine contractions and the expulsion of the living unborn child. Misoprostol,
the second drug in the RU 486 regimen, is also used for treatment of
gastro-intestinal problems making it easier to obtain in settings where
abortion on demand is illegal. WHW states on its website, "Misoprostol
alone, or in combination with mifepristone, is a safe and effective way to end
a pregnancy in the first 12 weeks. It is approved by the World Health
Organization as a safe abortion method when used by women themselves to 9 weeks
and has been used successfully by millions of women* around the world, without
a clinician." (* Women Help Women recognizes that gender-specific
terms do not encompass the rights and identities of all people that may seek to
end a pregnancy. We believe everyone has the right to feel supported and
respected during their abortion experience.)
The
abortion drugs promoted by WHW are known to cause severe hemorrhage and have
resulted in death. WHW attempts to protect itself by a disclaimer on the
website, "The contents of this webpage are for informational purposes only. The contents are not a substitute for advice from a medical provider."
Read more here.
|
|
IPPF's Media Manipulation in Africa
The International Planned Parenthood
Federation Africa Region (IPPFAR) is in the second
phase of a campaign to influence reporters and news
articles on controversial social issues including abortion under the umbrella
of the IPPFAR SRHR Journalists Network Group with funding from the David and
Lucille Packard Foundation. The campaign's goal is to achieve
"strengthened commitment to reproductive health issues by Governments,
Legislators and other key stakeholders, including calls for policy reviews and
change." The second phase of the project targets adolescents access to
'sexual and reproductive health and rights" and will be implemented in
collaboration with the African Union Commission (AUC).
An increasing number of news articles
sympathetic to the legalization of abortion have been appearing on news sites
from Africa. Lucien Kouakou, IPPF Africa Regional Director, addressed the
recent meeting of the network stating, "There is no doubt that
journalists are key influencers in the realization of positive change in
Africa, as they are instrumental in exploring new topics and fostering public
debate on important sexual and reproductive health issues. Through their
in-depth and quality reports, journalists have the unmatched ability to exert
pressure on governments to fulfil their mandates -especially those touching on
public health. IPPF Africa Region will continue to work with African
journalists in fostering the continent's development, and achieving
reproductive health gains in the continent."
|
|
|
Focus on the UN
|
|
UN "Experts" Pressure Honduras to Change Law against Abortion
Three individuals serving in capacity
as "experts" in three areas for the United Nations have called upon
Honduras to amend its abortion law while activists in the country push for
legislative changes. The statement issued from the Office of the High Commissioner
for Human Rights- Honduras
needs progressive reform of abortion law to advance women's human rights, say
UN experts -demonstrates the pro-abortion bias of the United Nations and is
another attempt to assign the designation of "human right" to an
horrific wrong-the death of an innocent child.
The statement begins, "Honduras
must allow wider scope for legal abortions in new legislation due to be put to
the country's parliament, so that women and girls can enjoy their full human
rights to sexual and reproductive health, UN experts* have urged." The UN experts, known pro-abortion activists who use their positions to push the abortion agenda, are *Alda Facio, Chair-Rapporteur of the Working Group on the issue of discrimination against women in law and in practice; Dainius Puras, Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health; and Dubravka Simonović, Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences. As a parliamentary committee is finalizing its opinion on changes to the penal code, pro-abortionists have been protesting seeking changes in provisions related to abortion. The three UN rapporteurs make a false claim about "international human rights standards" in regards to the legalization of abortion stating: "We sincerely hope that the Honduran Congress will seize this key opportunity to comply with its obligations to eliminating discrimination against women in its legislation, and to advance women's and adolescents' sexual and reproductive rights, in accordance with international human rights standards." There is no international right to abortion despite the claims by the three UN officials.
|
|
Two Child Advocate Selected for UNFPA Population Award
Professor Hans Rosling, a Swedish
doctor and statistician, was posthumously selected
to receive the United Nations Population Award having been nominated by the
European Parliamentary Forum on Population and Development. Rosling is most
famous for his work advancing the concept of two children per family stating
that 90% of parents in the world today decide on average to have two children
and that "the ideal family is no longer a large family".
Writing in Don't
panic! There's no population bomb Rosling stated in 2013,
"Yet paradoxically, the number of
children in the world is not going to rise from now on...This is what Brits
don't know: that in Bangladesh - and also in Brazil, Vietnam, India and big
African cities like Addis Ababa - two-child families are the norm. This change
from big families down to two-child families is one of the most important
things to happen in my lifetime. It's unprecedented in human history. It also
means that we'll see the end of fast population growth by the end of this
century."
|
|
|
Focus on the OAS
|
|
IACHR to Hear Abortion Case against El Salvador
Abortion
activists have been agitating for years to change El Salvador's pro-life laws
which are based on constitutional protection for the unborn child and disallow
all abortions. Now, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) at
the Organization of American States (OAS)
has announced
that it will hear the case of Manuela
which abortion activists hope will add to the pressure on El Salvador to
legalize abortion.
The
case was filed by Center for Reproductive Rights and Colectiva de Mujeres para
el Desarrollo Local and Agrupación Ciudadana por la Despenalización del Aborto
Terapéutico, Ético y Eugenésico, NGOs based in El Salvador, in the name of
Manuela and her family. Manuela was in prison for the crime of 'aggravated
homicide' having been found guilty in the death of her unborn child but
developed health issues for which it is claimed she did not receive adequate
treatment leading to her death.
Activists
deny that Manuel had been guilty of abortion and according to the Center for
Reproductive Rights' director for Latin America and the Caribbean Catalina
MartÃnez Coral charge that, "El Salvador's hostility towards abortion
led to Manuela's wrongful imprisonment and it ultimately cost her life. The
Inter-American Commission must now put pressure on the Salvadoran government to
end the criminalization of women and provide reparations to Manuela's
family."
The
case claims El Salvador violated Manuela's rights as declared in the American
Convention on Human Rights, the Inter-American Convention to Prevent and
Eliminate Torture, and the Inter-American Convention for the Prevention,
Punishment and Eradication of Violence Against Women (Convention of Belém do
Pará).
In
reaction to the IACHR decision, MartÃnez
Coral said, "We're really excited because
we have been waiting for an admission of the case since 2012. This is a huge
step and this is a very good moment to have this decision." Currently,
a bill to allow abortion for exceptions including a threat to the mother's
health has been introduced but pro-life support remains strong.
Human Rights Watch is also active in El
Salvador in the push to for the legalization of abortion which it acknowledges "faces
serious political opposition". Sarah Taylor of Human Rights Watch
explained the use of the Manuela case as a tool to help change El Salvador's
pro-life laws stating, "So the challenge is to create a lot of pressure in
order for the congress to respond to this." She explains that this will
happen if the IACHR rules in Manuela's favor, especially if it recommends that
"El Salvador decriminalize abortion or strengthen measures to protect
female patients' privacy".
|
|
|
Executive News
|
|
Ireland: Citizens' Assembly Recommends Legalization of Abortion
The Irish Citizens' Assembly has issued
its awaited recommendations, voting to legalize abortion in the pro-life
country. The special committee of 99 citizens was tasked with making
recommendations to the legislature on the country's Eighth Amendment, which
protects the right to life, after hearing testimony from individuals and
advocacy groups on the issue. The Assembly voted 52-29 in favor of unrestricted
access to abortion, with 25 of the 52 supporting abortion in the first
trimester, 23 in favor of a 22 week limit and 4 supporting no restrictions. In
the committee's report, which will be presented to parliament by the end of
June, Ms Justice Laffoy, a Supreme Court judge and chair of the assembly, will
recommend to parliament that the law should permit abortion on demand for the
first trimester. The committee's recommendations will now go to the Dail for a
vote, and then a public referendum will determine if the Eighth Amendment will
be replaced. Irish ministers have responded to the vote urging swift action.
The justice minister suggested a vote within a year.
|
|
Ireland: Health Minister Targets Crisis Pregnancy Centers
Ireland's health minister Simon Harris
seeks to
shut down a few pro-life crisis pregnancy centers following a news
investigation showed counselors linking abortion to trauma, breast cancer and
regret. The Times accused the crisis pregnancy centers of manipulating
information and providing free ultrasounds to persuade women to choose life.
The undercover operation by The Times of Ireland included pro-life counselors
from Human Life International's 'Ask Majella' crisis pregnancy center
counseling women on abortion. Patrick McCrystal, executive director of Human
Life International Ireland, said he was not surprised. "'Ask Majella' is
one of the few organizations supporting women by giving them the full truth
about the humanity of the unborn child and the horrific nature of
abortion," said McCrystal.
|
|
|
Judicial News
|
|
USA: Pro-Life Groups Applaud Addition of Neil Gorsuch to Supreme Court
The U.S. Senate has confirmed
pro-life nominee Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court by a vote of 54-45, despite
strong opposition from pro-abortion Democrats and groups including Planned
Parenthood. Both sides utilized parliamentary maneuvers, with Democrats
filibustering the nomination and Republicans employing the nuclear option which
changed the number of votes needed to approve the nomination from 60 to a
simple majority. Gorsuch has demonstrated a support for the right to life in
past comments on Roe v Wade and against assisted suicide; pro-life groups
celebrated his appointment. "All too often, our efforts to protect
unborn children and other vulnerable humans have been overridden by judges who
believe they have a right to impose their own policy preferences. Judge Gorsuch
appears to believe that judges are constrained to enforce the text and original
intent of constitutional provisions, and on all other matters should defer to
democratically elected lawmakers - this heartens us, and alarms those who have
relied on activist judges to impose their radical pro-abortion policies,"
said National Right to Life President Carol Tobias.
|
|
USA: Pro-Life Groups Applaud Addition of Neil Gorsuch to Supreme Court
The U.S. Senate has confirmed
pro-life nominee Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court by a vote of 54-45, despite
strong opposition from pro-abortion Democrats and groups including Planned
Parenthood. Both sides utilized parliamentary maneuvers, with Democrats
filibustering the nomination and Republicans employing the nuclear option which
changed the number of votes needed to approve the nomination from 60 to a
simple majority. Gorsuch has demonstrated a support for the right to life in
past comments on Roe v Wade and against assisted suicide; pro-life groups
celebrated his appointment. "All too often, our efforts to protect
unborn children and other vulnerable humans have been overridden by judges who
believe they have a right to impose their own policy preferences. Judge Gorsuch
appears to believe that judges are constrained to enforce the text and original
intent of constitutional provisions, and on all other matters should defer to
democratically elected lawmakers - this heartens us, and alarms those who have
relied on activist judges to impose their radical pro-abortion policies,"
said National Right to Life President Carol Tobias.
|
|
Sweden: Court Rules Against Midwife's Conscience Rights
The Swedish Labour
Court has ruled
against a pro-life midwife, setting a precedent of denying conscience rights
for Christian midwives. The Court ruled that the maternity clinic where Ellinor
Grimmark was seeking employment was within its rights to deny Grimmark the job
based on her objection to assisting abortions and distributing abortion pills
based on her Christian faith. "The Swedish Labour Court considers that a
portion of the [midwife's] demands are too out-of-date and no longer
applicable, and that the midwife has not been able to prove some of her
claims," stated the court. Grimmark plans to appeal the case to the
European Court of Human Rights.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parliamentary Network for Critical Issues
Advancing global respect and dignity for life through law
and policy.
|
www.pncius.org |
Visit us on the web!
www.PNCIUS.org
has been updated with expanded information on Human Dignity and critical
issues including: Abortion, Bioethics, Child Mortality, End of life issues,
Infanticide, Maternal mortality and Sex-selective abortion.
|
Contact PNCI |
|
Parliamentary Network for Critical Issues
P.O. Box 20203
Washington, DC 20041
703-433-2767
info@pncius.org
All news articles include links to original source. PNCI cannot verify that the
information contained in the news articles is accurate.
|
|
|